Subjects under University of New South Wales
Document Details

Public Law Mid Semester

User Description:
Public Law Mid Semester

Thinkswap Satisfaction Guarantee

Each document purchased on Thinkswap is covered by our Satisfaction Guarantee policy. If you are not satisfied with the quality of any document, or you believe the document was incorrectly described or categorised, Thinkswap will provide a full refund of exchange credits so you can check out another document. For more information please click here.

This student studied:
Claim a Thinkswap Bounty

Do you know if the Subject listed above has changed recently? Click report to earn free Exchange Credits!

Document Information:
10 Pages Partial Study Notes > 2 Years old
Share

1 Ex Credit


Document Screenshots:
Public Law Mid Semester
Topics this document covers:
Law Academia Philosophy of law Hans Kelsen Pure Theory of Law Basic norm Marbury v. Madison Judicial review Supreme court Australian constitutional law Constitutional amendment Law of Australia
This is a Partial Set of Study Notes

Partial Study Notes typically cover only single topics of a unit of study or do not cover multiple topics in significant detail. They are generally less than 20 pages in length.

What are Exchange Credits:

Exchange Credits represent the worth of each document on Thinkswap. In exchange for uploading documents you will receive credits. These can then be used to checkout other documents on Thinkswap.

Topics this document covers:
Law Academia Philosophy of law Hans Kelsen Pure Theory of Law Basic norm Marbury v. Madison Judicial review Supreme court Australian constitutional law Constitutional amendment Law of Australia
Sample Text:
But the difference lies solely in the existence of a federal rather than unitary system. Both traditions equally achieve the rule of the law.' Does this view accord with your own about the relationship between judicial review and the rule of law Marbury v Madison Marbury v Madison is a landmark case that framed the basis for the exercise of judicial review of the Constitution of the United States. Marbury was attempting to have a Judicial appointment enforced after the admittance of the new government, who refused to validate his appointment under the previous government. Chief Justice Marshall stated Marbury and the appointees were entitled to their roles, but the Court denied Marbury the petition to the Supreme Court on the basis that the Court did not have the power to grant the writ or petition because the Supreme Court did not have the jurisdiction to hear matters of or...
Similar Documents to Public Law Mid Semester

Public Law Notes

This student studied:
University of New South Wales - LAWS2140 - Public Law

Public Law Notes

1 Ex Credit

View Details

Very Comprehensive Notes for Australian Public Notes - Extremely Easy to Understand

This student studied:
University of New South Wales - LAWS2140 - Public Law

This document covers the topic Australian Public Law in a way that is very easy to understand. But that doesn't mean it doesn't cover the contents in-depth. The document is over 90 pages long and covers all necessary points. It does however miss some cases from 2016 and 2017 such as Day and Murphy.

1 Ex Credit

View Details

Complete Course Notes Public Law

This student studied:
University of New South Wales - LAWS2140 - Public Law

Complete Course Notes Public Law

1 Ex Credit

View Details

Constitutionism And Fiji Crisis

This student studied:
University of New South Wales - LAWS2140 - Public Law

Constitutionism And Fiji Crisis

1 Ex Credit

View Details