Subjects under University of Sydney
Document Details

CLAW1001 Assignment

User Description:
I have achieved 72 for this assignment, questions changes every time but they all have similarities and issues are usually the same

Thinkswap Satisfaction Guarantee

Each document purchased on Thinkswap is covered by our Satisfaction Guarantee policy. If you are not satisfied with the quality of any document, or you believe the document was incorrectly described or categorised, Thinkswap will provide a full refund of exchange credits so you can check out another document. For more information please click here.

1 Student found this Document helpful

This student studied:
Claim a Thinkswap Bounty

Do you know if the Subject listed above has changed recently? Click report to earn free Exchange Credits!

Document Information:
3 Pages Essays / Projects > 2 Years old
Share

2 Ex Credits


Document Screenshots:
 CLAW1001 Assignment
Topics this document covers:
Contract law Law Common law Private law Contract Estoppel Offer and acceptance Mistake Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd Unconscionability Consideration Ariel Therefore Blair Candy
This is an Essay / Project

Essays / Projects are typically greater than 5 pages in length and are assessments that have been previously submitted by a student for academic grading.

What are Exchange Credits:

Exchange Credits represent the worth of each document on Thinkswap. In exchange for uploading documents you will receive credits. These can then be used to checkout other documents on Thinkswap.

Topics this document covers:
Contract law Law Common law Private law Contract Estoppel Offer and acceptance Mistake Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd Unconscionability Consideration Ariel Therefore Blair Candy
Sample Text:
These included heads of agreement, intention to create legal contract, promissory estoppel and there are many sub issues that allow arguing in different perspectives. Firstly is about the contract of between Candy and Blair. During the discussion in the restau- rant, a heads of agreement has been created while Candy accepted Bliar’s proposal before they went in formal written contract later on. In Tasman Capital Pty Ltd v Sinclair1 as the judge decision was the heads of agreement involved an express acceptance of the offer by the applicant subject to for- mal contracts being exchanged, which means there was an legally binding contract was exchanged immediately2. The agreement has legality, which can contradict Blair’s rejection of “you agreed to the terms” The principle of contract contains an offer and an acceptance in order to create an legally binding c...
Similar Documents to CLAW1001 Assignment

Contracts-2

This student studied:
University of New South Wales - LAWS1075 - Contracts

Notes for Contracts-2 for the University for New South Wales and includes termination, implied terms and damages.

5 Ex Credits

View Details

Problem Based Assignment, Case Analysis

This student studied:
University of Sydney - CLAW1001 - Foundations of Business Law

This assignment focuses on the contract part of business law. It shows you how to well use the IPAC structure of analysing a legal case,to identify the issues, present the principles, analyse the material facts and then make a conclusion. This assignment received a HD mark (22/25)

2 Ex Credits

View Details

Contracts 1 Notes

This student studied:
University of New South Wales - LAWS1150 - Principles of Private Law

Contracts 1 Notes

1 Ex Credit

View Details

Summary Of Contracts1 Ratios

This student studied:
University of New South Wales - LAWS1150 - Principles of Private Law

Summary Of Contracts1 Ratios

1 Ex Credit

View Details