Find

Find

Search for over 200,000 study notes and past assignments!

Swap

Swap

Download study resources by swapping your own or buying Exchange Credits.

Study

Study

Study from your library anywhere, anytime.

3 Found helpful 8 Pages Essays / Projects Year: Pre-2021

Case Study Cameron is a student enrolled in the Bachelor of Nursing at Flame Tree University. Whilst on clinical placement, Cameron meets a patient, Darcy. Darcy is unable to walk, due to a stroke that left her with right-sided paralysis. Cameron and Darcy have some shared interests and strike up a friendship. Darcy has been smoking cigarettes for most of her adult life. The hospital has a ‘no smoking’ policy which means that there is no smoking within the hospital grounds. Those patients who are able to walk unassisted can access the ground floor of the hospital to sit outside the hospital steps and smoke a cigarette. This is not a possibility for Darcy and Darcy asks Cameron to for help getting to the ground floor. Cameron is not sure what to do. Darcy pleads and Cameron eventually agrees to help Darcy by getting a wheelchair and accompanying Darcy outside. They manage to get to the front steps without incident. However, Cameron’s clinical teacher, Kate, sees Cameron bringing Darcy back to the ward and asks about the reason for Cameron and Darcy’s absence from the ward. Kate thinks that Cameron has made a poor judgement in taking Darcy outside for a cigarette. Kate and Cameron have a long discussion about the ‘No Smoking’ policy. A few days later, Darcy is discharged to a rehabilitation facility. Pleased with Darcy’s progress, Cameron decides to post the story of Darcy on Facebook®, but does not identify Darcy by name. However, Cameron had revealed other details about the clinical placement in earlier postings, so it is possible to deduce where, and when, Cameron’s placement occurred. A hospital staff member reads Cameron’s story on Facebook® and reports the matter to the Director of Nursing who, in turn, informs the Dean of the faculty at the University where Cameron attends. The Dean asks you, a registered nurse in clinical practice, to review the matter and provide a report on the following issues: 1. What types of knowledge and/or ways of knowing should have informed Cameron’s decisions and actions in this matter?  Outline the fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing and explain how they apply to this scenario 2. What ethical issues can be raised as a result of this scenario?  What is the key ethical issue for the nursing student in this scenario?  Explain why this an issue?  Define the bioethical principles commonly utilised in healthcare and explain how they apply to the issue/s you have identified  How could these specific bioethical principles assist in decision making in this scenario? 3. What are Cameron’s legal responsibilities in this scenario?  What are the key legal issues in this case study?  What common law principles and/or legislation define those responsibilities? 4. What (if anything) do you think Cameron should have done differently? If you think that Cameron’s actions were reasonable you need to justify his actions.  What should Cameron have done instead? OR Why are his actions acceptable?  What is the rationale for your recommendations?  Justify your decision about what the nursing student should do with reference to the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council (ANMC) Code of Professional Conduct for Nurses.


This document is 10 Exchange Credits

More about this document:

This document has been hand checked

Every document on Thinkswap has been carefully hand checked to make sure it's correctly described and categorised. No more browsing through piles of irrelevant study resources.

This is an Essay / Project

Essays / Projects are typically greater than 5 pages in length and are assessments that have been previously submitted by a student for academic grading.

What are Exchange Credits?

Exchange Credits represent the worth of each document on Thinkswap. In exchange for uploading documents you will receive Exchange Credits. These credits can then be used to download other documents for free.

Satisfaction Guarantee

We want you to be satisfied with your learning, that’s why all documents on Thinkswap are covered by our Satisfaction Guarantee. If a document is not of an acceptable quality or the document was incorrectly described or categorised, we will provide a full refund of Exchange Credits so that you can get another document. For more information please read Thinkswap's Satisfaction Guarantee.

Academic Integrity
Studying with Academic Integrity

Studying from past student work is an amazing way to learn and research, however you must always act with academic integrity.

This document is the prior work of another student. Thinkswap has partnered with Turnitin to ensure students cannot copy directly from our resources. Understand how to responsibly use this work by visiting ‘Using Thinkswap resources correctly’.

Claim a Bounty

NMIH - Assessment 2 - Case Study - Page 1
Page 1 /8
Page 1 /8

Similar documents to "NMIH - Assessment 2 - Case Study" avaliable on Thinkswap

Documents similar to "NMIH - Assessment 2 - Case Study" are suggested based on similar topic fingerprints from a variety of other Thinkswap Subjects

Browse UOW Subjects

University

High School