Find

Find

Search for over 200,000 study notes and past assignments!

Swap

Swap

Download study resources by swapping your own or buying Exchange Credits.

Study

Study

Study from your library anywhere, anytime.

35 Pages Topic Notes Year Uploaded: 2023

Overview The key purpose of this Study Unit is to examine the courts’ role in creating common law rules as to the standard of care. Particularly, it focuses on how Singapore courts have developed common law rules to determine how a breach of this standard (of care) applies to professionals, especially doctors. The discussion below suggests that the courts have developed the common law rules in an organic, cautious, and incremental manner over a period of time. In this area of law-making, the courts have performed a reactive role. They respond to social changes by refining its case law, in accordance with precedents. This reactive approach creates some legal uncertainty in the common law. In the area of medical negligence, the precise content of standard of care (as it applies to doctors) became unclear. It is against this context that prompted the Court of Appeal to clarify the Singapore position in the landmark case of Hii Chii Kok v Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien and another.2 We return to this case below.


This document is 10 Exchange Credits

More about this document:

This document has been hand checked

Every document on Thinkswap has been carefully hand checked to make sure it's correctly described and categorised. No more browsing through piles of irrelevant study resources.

These are Topic Notes

Topic Notes typically cover a topic (or several topics) in detail. They are not expected to cover all the topics in the course and are often less than 20 pages in length.

What are Exchange Credits?

Exchange Credits represent the worth of each document on Thinkswap. In exchange for uploading documents you will receive Exchange Credits. These credits can then be used to download other documents for free.

Satisfaction Guarantee

We want you to be satisfied with your learning, that’s why all documents on Thinkswap are covered by our Satisfaction Guarantee. If a document is not of an acceptable quality or the document was incorrectly described or categorised, we will provide a full refund of Exchange Credits so that you can get another document. For more information please read Thinkswap's Satisfaction Guarantee.

Academic Integrity
Studying with Academic Integrity

Studying from past student work is an amazing way to learn and research, however you must always act with academic integrity.

This document is the prior work of another student. Thinkswap has partnered with Turnitin to ensure students cannot copy directly from our resources. Understand how to responsibly use this work by visiting ‘Using Thinkswap resources correctly’.

Claim a Bounty

Breach of common law and statutory duty of care - Page 1
Page 1 /35
Page 1 /35
Breach of common law and statutory duty of care - Page 2
Page 2 /35
Page 2 /35
Breach of common law and statutory duty of care - Page 3
Page 3 /35
Page 3 /35
Breach of common law and statutory duty of care - Page 17
Page 17 /35
Page 17 /35
Breach of common law and statutory duty of care - Page 26
Page 26 /35
Page 26 /35

Similar documents to "Breach of common law and statutory duty of care" avaliable on Thinkswap

Documents similar to "Breach of common law and statutory duty of care" are suggested based on similar topic fingerprints from a variety of other Thinkswap Subjects

Browse SMU Subjects

University

Junior College