Search for over 100,000 study notes and past assignments!
Download study resources by swapping your own or buying Exchange Credits.
4 Pages • Essays / Projects • Year: Pre-2019
Case Note of Joyce v Visser  TASSC 116. The case exposes the inadequacies of sentencing by the courts in matters of animal cruelty.
This document is 20 Exchange Credits
More about this document:
This document has been hand checked
Every document on Thinkswap has been carefully hand checked to make sure it's correctly described and categorised. No more browsing through piles of irrelevant study resources.
This is an Essay / Project
Essays / Projects are typically greater than 5 pages in length and are assessments that have been previously submitted by a student for academic grading.
What are Exchange Credits?
Exchange Credits represent the worth of each document on Thinkswap. In exchange for uploading documents you will receive Exchange Credits. These credits can then be used to download other documents for free.
We want you to be satisfied with your learning, that’s why all documents on Thinkswap are covered by our Satisfaction Guarantee. If a document is not of an acceptable quality or the document was incorrectly described or categorised, we will provide a full refund of Exchange Credits so that you can get another document. For more information please read Thinkswap's Satisfaction Guarantee.
Studying with Academic Integrity
Studying from past student work is an amazing way to learn and research, however you must always act with academic integrity.
This document is the prior work of another student. Thinkswap has partnered with Turnitin to ensure students cannot copy directly from our resources. Understand how to responsibly use this work by visiting ‘Using Thinkswap resources correctly’.
Claim a Bounty
Similar documents to "Case Note: Joyce v Visser " avaliable on Thinkswap
Documents similar to "Case Note: Joyce v Visser " are suggested based on similar topic fingerprints from a variety of other Thinkswap Subjects