Search for over 100,000 study notes and past assignments!



Download study resources by swapping your own or buying Exchange Credits.



Study from your library anywhere, anytime.

Torts LAW256 Paper on Analysing Sullivan and Moody

LAW256 - Torts

7 Pages Essays / Projects Year: Pre-2018

This paper analyses Sullivan and Moody and a case question given in the unit Here is an excerpt: "Sullivan v Moody1 is the principle authority for determining cases where a novel duty of care is present. Reasonable foreseeability was deemed non-contentious because the appellant incontestably ‘suffered harm of the kind alleged in consequence of the negligent’2 sexual abuse allegation. However, ‘the foreseeability of harm was not sufficient enough to give rise to a duty of care’."

This document is 20 Exchange Credits

More about this document:

This document has been hand checked

Every document on Thinkswap has been carefully hand checked to make sure it's correctly described and categorised. No more browsing through piles of irrelevant study resources.

This is an Essay / Project

Essays / Projects are typically greater than 5 pages in length and are assessments that have been previously submitted by a student for academic grading.

What are Exchange Credits?

Exchange Credits represent the worth of each document on Thinkswap. In exchange for uploading documents you will receive Exchange Credits. These credits can then be used to download other documents for free.

Satisfaction Guarantee

We want you to be satisfied with your learning, that’s why all documents on Thinkswap are covered by our Satisfaction Guarantee. If a document is not of an acceptable quality or the document was incorrectly described or categorised, we will provide a full refund of Exchange Credits so that you can get another document. For more information please read Thinkswap's Satisfaction Guarantee.

Academic Integrity
Studying with Academic Integrity

Studying from past student work is an amazing way to learn and research, however you must always act with academic integrity.

This document is the prior work of another student and has been made available to plagiarism detection tools. Do not copy from this work. Understand how you can responsibly use this work by visiting ‘Using Thinkswap resources correctly’.

Claim a Bounty

Torts LAW256 Paper on Analysing Sullivan and Moody - Page 1
Page 1 /7
Page 1 /7

Similar documents to "Torts LAW256 Paper on Analysing Sullivan and Moody" avaliable on Thinkswap

Documents similar to "Torts LAW256 Paper on Analysing Sullivan and Moody" are suggested based on similar topic fingerprints from a variety of other Thinkswap Subjects

Browse UTAS Subjects


High School